Skip to main contentSkip to search
Episciences
Open Access Journals
Sign in(new window)
Journal of Studies of Earth’s Deep Interior logo
Journal of Studies of Earth’s Deep Interior
Journal of Studies of Earth’s Deep Interior logo
Journal of Studies of Earth’s Deep Interior
Sign in(new window)
Articles & Issues
All articlesAll accepted articlesAll volumesLast volumeAuthors
About
The journalNews
Boards
Publish
For authorsEthical charter
Submit
Journal of Studies of Earth’s Deep Interior logo
Journal's leaflet
|
Contact
|
Credits
eISSN 3099-2877
|
RSS
|
Atom
Episciences
Documentation
|
Acknowledgements
|
Publishing policy
Accessibility: non-compliant
|
Legal mentions
|
Privacy statement
|
Terms of use
  1. Home > Articles & Issues >
  2. Articles >
  3. The mantle-inner cor ...
Article

The mantle-inner core gravitational mode of oscillation in a strong magnetic field regime

Mathieu Dumberry ORCID (1)
(1) University of Alberta
Download article
Open on Zenodo
Imported on
May 23, 2025
Published on
September 25, 2025
Last modified on
April 16, 2026
Volume 1
Volume 1
DOI
10.46298/jsedi.15735
Indicators
156
Views
156
Downloads

The mantle-inner core gravitational mode of oscillation in a strong magnetic field regime

Mathieu Dumberry ORCID (1)
(1) University of Alberta
Abstract
The mantle-inner core gravitational (MICG) mode is the free mode axial oscillation between the mantle and inner core sustained by the gravitational torque between their degree 2 order 2 density structures. As part of this mode, the tangent cylinder (TC) is entrained to move jointly with the inner core, and the oscillations of the TC launch Alfvén waves propagating in the region outside the TC. Here, we investigate how the MICG is altered by the strength of the internal magnetic field in the core which controls the travelling speed of Alfvén waves. We show that the MICG mode remains a distinct normal mode of oscillation of the core-mantle system only when Alfvén waves are attenuated before they traverse the width of the fluid core. For an internal magnetic field strength of a few mT, as we expect in Earth's core, Alfvén waves can readily traverse the width of the core, and the MICG mode is absorbed into the spectrum of torsional oscillation (TO) modes. The MICG period retains a dynamical influence, acting as a point of resonance for TO modes, and marking the transition from a TO mode that is weakly impacted by gravitational coupling to one in which the motion of the TC (including the inner core) is strongly restricted. Our results imply that the observed 6-year periodic signal in the length of day cannot be interpreted as the signature of the MICG mode and must instead be caused by TO modes, or more generally, by the propagation of Alfvén waves.
Linked publications - datasets - software
  • Is supplemented by
    https://doi.org/10.5683/SP3/HF3RJQ
References

  1. Abarca del Rio, R., D. Gambis, and D. A. Salstein (2000). Interannual signals in length of day and atmospheric angular momentum. Ann. Geophys. 18, 347–364. doi: 10.1007/s00585-000-0347-9.

    DOI : 10.1007/s00585-000-0347-9

  2. Aubert, J. and M. Dumberry (2011). Steady and fluctuating inner core rotation in numerical geodynamo models. Geophys. J. Int. 184, 162–170. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-246x.2010.04842.x.

    DOI : 10.1111/j.1365-246x.2010.04842.x

  3. Aubert, J., S. Labrosse, and C. Poitou (2009). Modelling the palaeo-evolution of the geodynamo. Geophys. J. Int. 179, 1414–1428. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-246x.2009.04361.x.

    DOI : 10.1111/j.1365-246x.2009.04361.x

  4. Braginsky, S. I. (1970). Torsional magnetohydrodynamic vibrations in the Earth’s core and variations in day length. Geomag. Aeron. 10, 1–10.

  5. Braginsky, S. I. (1984). Short-period geomagnetic secular variation. Geophys. Astrophys. Fluid Dyn 30, 1–78. doi: 10.1080/03091928408210077.

    DOI : 10.1080/03091928408210077

  6. Buffett, B. A. (1996a). A mechanism for fluctuations in the length of day. Geophys. Res. Lett. 23, 3803–3806. doi: 10.1029/96gl03571.

    DOI : 10.1029/96gl03571

  7. Buffett, B. A. (1996b). Gravitational oscillations in the length of the day. Geophys. Res. Lett. 23, 2279–2282. doi: 10.1029/96gl02083.

    DOI : 10.1029/96gl02083

  8. Buffett, B. A. (1998). Free oscillations in the length of day: inferences on physical properties near the core-mantle boundary. The core-mantle boundary region. Ed. by M. Gurnis, M. E. Wysession, E. Knittle, and B. A. Buffett. Vol. 28. Geodynamics series. Washington, DC: AGU Geophysical Monograph, pp. 153–165.

  9. Buffett, B. A. and G. A. Glatzmaier (2000). Gravitational braking of inner-core rotation in geodynamo simulations. Geophys. Res. Lett. 27, 3125–3128. doi: 10.1029/2000gl011705.

    DOI : 10.1029/2000gl011705

  10. Buffett, B. A. and J. E. Mound (2005). A Green’s function for the excitation of torsional oscillations in the Earth’s core. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 110, B08104. doi: 10.1029/2004JB003495.

    DOI : 10.1029/2004JB003495

  11. Cazenave, A., J. Pfeffer, M. Mandea, V. Dehant, and N. Gillet (2025). Why is the Earth system oscillating at a 6-year period? Surv. Geophys. 46, 503–528. doi: 10.1007/s10712-024-09874-4.

    DOI : 10.1007/s10712-024-09874-4

  12. Chao, B. F. (2017). Dynamics of axial torsional libration under the mantle-inner core gravitational interaction. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 122, 560–571. doi: 10.1002/2016jb013515.

    DOI : 10.1002/2016jb013515

  13. Chao, B. F., W. Chung, S. Z., and Y. Hsieh (2014). Earth’s rotation variations: a wavelet analysis. Terra Nova 26, 260–264. doi: 10.1111/ter.12094.

    DOI : 10.1111/ter.12094

  14. Christensen, U. R. and J. Aubert (2006). Scaling properties of convection-driven dynamos in rotating spherical shells and application to planetary magnetic fields. Geophys. J. Int. 166, 97–114. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-246x.2006.03009.x.

    DOI : 10.1111/j.1365-246x.2006.03009.x

  15. Davies, C. J., D. R. Stegman, and M. Dumberry (2014). The strength of gravitational core-mantle coupling. Geophys. Res. Lett. 41, 3786–3792. doi: 10.1002/2014gl059836.

    DOI : 10.1002/2014gl059836

  16. Defraigne, P., V. Dehant, and J. M. Wahr (1996). Internal loading of an inhomogeneous compressible Earth with phase boundaries. Geophys. J. Int. 125, 173–192. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-246x.1996.tb06544.x.

    DOI : 10.1111/j.1365-246x.1996.tb06544.x

  17. Ding, H. and B. F. Chao (2018). A 6-yr westward rotary motion in the Earth: Detection and possible MICG coupling mechanism. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 495, 50–55. doi: 10.1016/j.epsl.2018.05.009.

    DOI : 10.1016/j.epsl.2018.05.009

  18. Duan, P., G. Liu, X. Hu, J. Zhao, and C. Huang (2018). Mechanism of the interannual oscillations in length of day and its constraint on the electromagnetic coupling at the core-mantle boundary. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 482, 245–252. doi: 10.1016/j.epsl.2017.11.007.

    DOI : 10.1016/j.epsl.2017.11.007

  19. Dumberry, M. (2025). Replication Data for: The mantle-inner core gravitational mode of oscillation in a strong magnetic field regime. Version V2. doi: 10.5683/SP3/HF3RJQ.

    DOI : 10.5683/SP3/HF3RJQ

  20. Dumberry, M. and J. E. Mound (2008). Constraints on core- mantle electromagnetic coupling from torsional oscillation normal modes. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 113, B03102. doi: 10.1029/2007jb005135.

    DOI : 10.1029/2007jb005135

  21. Dumberry, M. and J. E. Mound (2010). Inner core–mantle gravitational locking and the super-rotation of the inner core. Geophys. J. Int. 181, 806–817. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-246x.2010.04563.x.

    DOI : 10.1111/j.1365-246x.2010.04563.x

  22. Forte, A. M., R. L. Woodward, and A. Dziewonski (1994). Joint inversions of seismic and geodynamic data for models of three-dimensional mantle heterogeneity. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 99, 21857–21877. doi: 10.1029/94jb01467.

    DOI : 10.1029/94jb01467
Preview
Loading PDF preview...