Skip to main contentSkip to search
Episciences
Open Access Journals
Sign in(new window)
Journal of Studies of Earth’s Deep Interior logo
Journal of Studies of Earth’s Deep Interior
Journal of Studies of Earth’s Deep Interior logo
Journal of Studies of Earth’s Deep Interior
Sign in(new window)
Articles & Issues
All articlesAll accepted articlesAll volumesLast volumeAuthors
About
The journalNews
Boards
Publish
For authorsEthical charter
Submit
Journal of Studies of Earth’s Deep Interior logo
Journal's leaflet
|
Contact
|
Credits
eISSN 3099-2877
|
RSS
|
Atom
Episciences
Documentation
|
Acknowledgements
|
Publishing policy
Accessibility: non-compliant
|
Legal mentions
|
Privacy statement
|
Terms of use
  1. Home > Articles & Issues >
  2. Articles >
  3. Joint Bayesian infer ...
Article

Joint Bayesian inference of Earth's magnetic field and core surface flow on millennial timescales

Andreas Nilsson (1), Neil Suttie (1), Marie Troyano (1), Nicolas Gillet, Julien Aubert (2), Anders Irbäck
(1) Lund University
(2) Institut de physique du globe de Paris
Download article
Open on arXiv
Submitted on
January 16, 2026
Accepted on
March 26, 2026
Published on
March 30, 2026
Last modified on
August 7, 2026
Volume 2
Volume 2
DOI
10.46298/jsedi.17320
License
Attribution-Non Commercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)
Indicators
834
Views
287
Downloads

Joint Bayesian inference of Earth's magnetic field and core surface flow on millennial timescales

Andreas Nilsson (1), Neil Suttie (1), Marie Troyano (1), Nicolas Gillet, Julien Aubert (2), Anders Irbäck
(1) Lund University
(2) Institut de physique du globe de Paris
Abstract
Understanding Earth's core dynamics over millennial timescales requires models that jointly describe the evolution of the geomagnetic field and core surface flow, while accommodating the sparse, irregular, and uncertain nature of archaeomagnetic and palaeomagnetic data. We present a new Bayesian core field and core flow modelling framework that utilises archaeo/palaeomagnetic data directly, combining a reduced stochastic representation of core surface dynamics derived from numerical geodynamo statistics with a probabilistic treatment of observational and chronological uncertainties. A key innovation is an efficient discrete marginalisation of age uncertainties, which avoids the convergence difficulties associated with co-estimating ages in high-dimensional Hamiltonian Monte Carlo inversions. The framework aims to reconstruct the coupled evolution of the geomagnetic field and core surface flow over the past 9000 years while preserving dynamical correlations implied by the prior geodynamo time series. Tests using synthetic data generated from an Earth-like geodynamo demonstrate that the method reliably recovers large-scale geomagnetic field variations and key aspects of core dynamics, including long-term westward drift and the evolution of planetary-scale eccentric gyres. These results show that, when combined with physically informed priors, archaeo/palaeomagnetic data can constrain millennial-scale core flow, paving the way for reconstructions based on real data. 19 pages, 13 figures
Keywords
  • Geophysics
Preview
Loading PDF preview...
References
  1. Allington, M. L., Nilsson, A., Hill, M. J., Suttie, N., Daniil, D., Hjorth, I., Aulin, L., Augustinus, P. C., & Shane, P. Constraining the Eruption History of {{Rangitoto}} Volcano, {{New Zealand}}, Using Palaeomagnetic Data. Quat. Geochronol. 78, 101459. doi: 10.1016/j.quageo.2023.101459.

    DOI : 10.1016/j.quageo.2023.101459
  2. Aubert, J. Earth’s core internal dynamics 1840–2010 imaged by inverse geodynamo modelling. Geophys. J. Int. 197.3, 1321–1334. doi: 10.1093/gji/ggu064.

    DOI : 10.1093/gji/ggu064
  3. Aubert, J. State and evolution of the geodynamo from numerical models reaching the physical conditions of Earth’s core. Geophys. J. Int. 235.1, 468–487. doi: 10.1093/gji/ggad229.

    DOI : 10.1093/gji/ggad229
  4. Aubert, J., Finlay, C. C., & Fournier, A. Bottom-up control of geomagnetic secular variation by the Earth’s inner core. Nature 502.7470, 219–223. doi: 10.1038/nature12574.

    DOI : 10.1038/nature12574
  5. Aubert, J., Gastine, T., & Fournier, A. Spherical convective dynamos in the rapidly rotating asymptotic regime. J. Fluid Mech. 813, 558–593. doi: 10.1017/jfm.2016.789.

    DOI : 10.1017/jfm.2016.789
  6. Aubert, J., & Gillet, N. The interplay of fast waves and slow convection in geodynamo simulations nearing Earth’s core conditions. Geophys. J. Int. 225.3, 1854–1873. doi: 10.1093/gji/ggab054.

    DOI : 10.1093/gji/ggab054
  7. Aubert, J., M. Landeau, A. Fournier, and T. Gastine (2025). Core-surface kinematic control of polarity reversals in advanced geodynamo simulations. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. 364, 107365. doi: 10.1016/j.pepi.2025.107365.

    DOI : 10.1016/j.pepi.2025.107365
  8. Blaauw, M. and J. A. Christen (2011). Flexible paleoclimate age-depth models using an autoregressive gamma process. Bayesian Anal. 6.3, 457–474. doi: 10.1214/ba/1339616472.

    DOI : 10.1214/ba/1339616472
  9. Blow, R. A. and N. Hamilton (1978). Effect of compaction on the acquisition of a detrital remanent magnetization in fine-grained sediments. Geophys. J. R. Astr. Soc. 52.1, 13– 23. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-246X.1978.tb04219.x.

    DOI : 10.1111/j.1365-246X.1978.tb04219.x
  10. Bohsung, L., M. Schanner, M. Korte, and M. Holschneider (2023). Estimating post-Depositional Detrital Remanent Magnetization (pDRM) Effects: A Flexible Lock-In Function Approach. J. Geophys. Res. 128.12, e2023JB027373. doi: 10.1029/2023JB027373.

    DOI : 10.1029/2023JB027373
  11. Bohsung, L., M. Schanner, M. Korte, and M. Holschneider (2024). Estimating Post-Depositional Detrital Remanent Magnetization (pDRM) Effects for Several Lacustrine and Marine Sediment Records Using a Flexible Lock-In Function Approach. J. Geophys. Res. 129.7, e2024JB028864. doi: 10.1029/2024JB028864.

    DOI : 10.1029/2024JB028864
  12. Brown, M., F. Donadini, M. Korte, A. Nilsson, K. Korhonen, A. Lodge, S. Lengyel, and C. Constable (2015). GEOMAGIA50.v3: 1. general structure and modifications to the archeological and volcanic database. Earth Planets Space 67.1, 83. doi: 10.1186/s40623-015-0232-0.

    DOI : 10.1186/s40623-015-0232-0
  13. Brown, M. C., G. Hervé, M. Korte, and A. Genevey (2021). Global archaeomagnetic data: The state of the art and future challenges. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. 318, 106766. doi: 10.1016/j.pepi.2021.106766.

    DOI : 10.1016/j.pepi.2021.106766
  14. Campuzano, S., M. Gómez-Paccard, F. Pavón-Carrasco, and M. Osete (2019). Emergence and evolution of the South Atlantic Anomaly revealed by the new paleomagnetic reconstruction SHAWQ2k. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 512, 17–26. doi: 10.1016/j.epsl.2019.01.050.

    DOI : 10.1016/j.epsl.2019.01.050
  15. Carpenter, B., Gelman, A., Hoffman, M. D., Lee, D., Goodrich, B., Betancourt, M., Brubaker, M., Guo, J., Li, P., & Riddell, A. Stan: A Probabilistic Programming Language.

    DOI : 10.18637/jss.v076.i01
  16. Constable, C., Korte, M., & Panovska, S. Persistent high paleosecular variation activity in southern hemisphere for at least 10,000 years.

    DOI : 10.1016/j.epsl.2016.08.015
  17. Dumberry, M., & Bloxham, J. Azimuthal flows in the Earth’s core and changes in length of day at millennial timescales.

    DOI : 10.1111/j.1365-246X.2006.02903.x
  18. Dumberry, M., & Finlay, C. C. Eastward and westward drift of the Earth’s magnetic field for the last three millennia.

    DOI : 10.1016/j.epsl.2006.11.026
  19. Finlay, C. C., Kloss, C., Olsen, N., Hammer, M. D., Tøffner-Clausen, L., Grayver, A., & Kuvshinov, A. The CHAOS-7 geomagnetic field model and observed changes in the South Atlantic Anomaly.

    DOI : 10.1186/s40623-020-01252-9
  20. Gillet, N., Huder, L., & Aubert, J. A reduced stochastic model of core surface dynamics based on geodynamo simulations.

    DOI : 10.1093/gji/ggz313
  21. Gillet, N., Dall’Asta, F., Amblard, P.-O., Claveau, R., & Aubert, J. Waves in Earth’s core and geomagnetic field forecast.

    DOI : 10.1016/j.pepi.2024.107284
  22. Gillet, N., Jault, D., Finlay, C. C., & Olsen, N. Stochastic modeling of the Earth’s magnetic field: Inversion for covariances over the observatory era.

    DOI : 10.1002/ggge.20041
  23. Gillet, N., Gerick, F., Jault, D., Schwaiger, T., Aubert, J., & Istas, M. Satellite magnetic data reveal interannual waves in Earth’s core.

    DOI : 10.1073/pnas.2115258119
  24. Hellio, G., & Gillet, N. Time-correlation-based regression of the geomagnetic field from archeological and sediment records.

    DOI : 10.1093/gji/ggy214
  25. Holme, R. 8.04 - Large-Scale Flow in the Core. Elsevier.

    DOI : 10.1016/B978-0-444-53802-4.00138-X
  26. Huder, L., Gillet, N., & Thollard, F. pygeodyn 1.1.0: a Python package for geomagnetic data assimilation.

    DOI : 10.5194/gmd-12-3795-2019
  27. Hyodo, M. Possibility of Reconstruction of the Past Geomagnetic Field from Homogeneous Sediments.

    DOI : 10.5636/jgg.36.45
  28. Istas, M., Gillet, N., Finlay, C. C., Hammer, M. D., & Huder, L. Transient Core Surface Dynamics from Ground and Satellite Geomagnetic Data.

    DOI : 10.1093/gji/ggad039
  29. Kiani Shahvandi, M., Noir, J., Mishra, S., & Soja, B. Length of {{Day Variations Explained}} in a {{Bayesian Framework}}.

    DOI : 10.1029/2024GL111148
  30. Langel, R. A. Ch 4 - The main geomagnetic field. Academic Press.

  31. Licht, A., Hulot, G., Gallet, Y., & Thébault, E. Ensembles of low degree archeomagnetic field models for the past three millennia.

    DOI : 10.1016/j.pepi.2013.08.007
  32. Lloyd, D., & Gubbins, D. Toroidal fluid motion at the top of the Earth’s core.

    DOI : 10.1111/j.1365-246X.1990.tb00698.x
  33. McHutchon, A., & Rasmussen, C. E. Gaussian Process training with input noise. Curran Associates Inc.

    DOI : 10.5555/2986459.2986609
  34. Mellström, A., Nilsson, A., Stanton, T., Muscheler, R., Snowball, I., & Suttie, N. Post-depositional remanent magnetization lock-in depth in precisely dated varved sediments assessed by archaeomagnetic field models.

    DOI : 10.1016/j.epsl.2014.11.016
  35. Meynadier, L., & Valet, J.-P. Post-depositional realignment of magnetic grains and asymmetrical saw-tooth patterns of magnetization intensity.

    DOI : 10.1016/0012-821X(96)00018-0
  36. Morrison, L. V., & Stephenson, F. R. Historical eclipses and the variability of the Earth’s rotation.

    DOI : 10.1016/s0264-3707(01)00024-2
  37. Mound, J. E., & Davies, C. J. Longitudinal structure of Earth’s magnetic field controlled by lower mantle heat flow.

    DOI : 10.1038/s41561-023-01148-9
  38. Neumaier, A., & Schneider, T. Estimation of parameters and eigenmodes of multivariate autoregressive models.

    DOI : 10.1145/382043.382304
  39. Nilsson, A., Holme, R., Korte, M., Suttie, N., & Hill, M. J. Reconstructing Holocene geomagnetic field variation: New methods, models and implications.

    DOI : 10.1093/gji/ggu120
  40. Nilsson, A., Nguyen, L., Panovska, S., Herbst, K., Zheng, M., Suttie, N., & Muscheler, R. Holocene solar activity inferred from global and hemispherical cosmic-ray proxy records.

    DOI : 10.1038/s41561-024-01467-5
  41. Nilsson, A., & Suttie, N. Probabilistic approach to geomagnetic field modelling of data with age uncertainties and post-depositional magnetisations.

    DOI : 10.1016/j.pepi.2021.106737
  42. Nilsson, A., Suttie, N., & Hill, M. J. Short-Term Magnetic Field Variations From the Post-depositional Remanence of Lake Sediments.

    DOI : 10.3389/feart.2018.00039
  43. Nilsson, A., Suttie, N., Korte, M., Holme, R., & Hill, M. Persistent westward drift of the geomagnetic field at the core–mantle boundary linked to recurrent high-latitude weak/reverse flux patches.

    DOI : 10.1093/gji/ggaa249
  44. Nilsson, A., Suttie, N., Stoner Joseph, S., & Muscheler, R. Recurrent ancient geomagnetic field anomalies shed light on future evolution of the South Atlantic Anomaly.

    DOI : 10.1073/pnas.2200749119
  45. Pais, M. A., & Jault, D. Quasi-geostrophic flows responsible for the secular variation of the Earth’s magnetic field.

    DOI : 10.1111/j.1365-246X.2008.03741.x
  46. Pozzo, M., Davies, C. J., & Alfè, D. Towards reconciling experimental and computational determinations of Earth’s core thermal conductivity.

    DOI : 10.1016/j.epsl.2022.117466
  47. Rasmussen, C. E., & Williams, C. K. I. Gaussian Processes for Machine Learning. the MIT Press.

  48. Rivera, P., Pavón-Carrasco, F. J., & Osete, M. L. Reconstruction of Core-Surface Flows During the Last 3,300 Years.

    DOI : 10.1029/2025GC012475
  49. Roberts, A. P., & Winklhofer, M. Why are geomagnetic excursions not always recorded in sediments? Constraints from post-depositional remanent magnetization lock-in modelling.

    DOI : 10.1016/j.epsl.2004.07.040
  50. Rogers, H. F., Gillet, N., Aubert, J., Personnettaz, P., & Mandea, M. Effects of geodynamo priors and geomagnetic data on inverted core surface flows.

    DOI : 10.1016/j.pepi.2025.107323
  51. Sanchez, S., Fournier, A., Aubert, J., Cosme, E., & Gallet, Y. Modelling the archaeomagnetic field under spatial constraints from dynamo simulations: a resolution analysis.

    DOI : 10.1093/gji/ggw316
  52. Schanner, M., Korte, M., & Holschneider, M. ArchKalmag14k: A Kalman‐Filter Based Global Geomagnetic Model for the Holocene.

    DOI : 10.1029/2021JB023166
  53. Schanner, M., Mauerberger, S., Korte, M., & Holschneider, M. Correlation Based Time Evolution of the Archeomagnetic Field.

    DOI : 10.1029/2020JB021548
  54. Schwaiger, T., Jault, D., Gillet, N., Schaeffer, N., & Mandea, M. Local estimation of quasi-geostrophic flows in Earth’s core.

    DOI : 10.1093/gji/ggad089
  55. Snowball, I., Mellström, A., Ahlstrand, E., Haltia, E., Nilsson, A., Ning, W., Muscheler, R., & Brauer, A. An estimate of post-depositional remanent magnetization lock-in depth in organic rich varved lake sediments.

    DOI : 10.1016/j.gloplacha.2013.10.005
  56. Suttie, N., Nilsson, A., Gillet, N., & Dumberry, M. Large-scale palaeoflow at the top of Earth’s core.

    DOI : 10.1016/j.epsl.2024.119185
  57. Vehtari, A., Gelman, A., Simpson, D., Carpenter, B., & Bürkner, P.-C. Rank-Normalization Folding and Localization: An Improved $\hat{R}$ for Assessing Convergence of MCMC (with Discussion).

    DOI : 10.1214/20-BA1221
  58. Wardinski, I., & Korte, M. The evolution of the core-surface flow over the last seven thousands years.

    DOI : 10.1029/2007jb005024
  59. Wardinski, I., Terra-Nova, F., & Thébault, E. Evaluation of archeo- and paleomagnetic field models and their common features.

    DOI : 10.1016/j.pepi.2025.107399
  60. West, G., Nilsson, A., Geels, A., Jakobsson, M., Moros, M., Muschitiello, F., Pearce, C., Snowball, I., & O’Regan, M. Late Holocene Paleomagnetic Secular Variation in the Chukchi Sea, Arctic Ocean.

    DOI : 10.1029/2021GC010187
  61. Whaler, K. A. Geomagnetic evidence for fluid upwelling at the core-mantle boundary.

    DOI : 10.1111/j.1365-246X.1986.tb03844.x